#smrgKİTABEVİ Adopting A Feminist Legal Perspective In Adjudication: A Comparative Analysis Of The Judgments Of The Constitutional Court Of Turkey And European Court Of Human Rights - 2024

Editör:
Kondisyon:
Yeni
Sunuş / Önsöz / Sonsöz / Giriş:
Basıldığı Matbaa:
Dizi Adı:
ISBN-10:
6255994028
Kargoya Teslim Süresi:
4&6
Hazırlayan:
Cilt:
Amerikan Cilt
Stok Kodu:
1199233504
Boyut:
16x24
Sayfa Sayısı:
291
Basım Yeri:
İstanbul
Baskı:
1
Basım Tarihi:
2024
Kapak Türü:
Karton Kapak
Kağıt Türü:
Enso
Dili:
İngilizce
Kategori:
indirimli
297,50
Havale/EFT ile: 288,58
Siparişiniz 4&6 iş günü arasında kargoda
1199233504
620431
Adopting A Feminist Legal Perspective In Adjudication: A Comparative Analysis Of The Judgments Of The Constitutional Court Of Turkey And European Court Of Human Rights -        2024
Adopting A Feminist Legal Perspective In Adjudication: A Comparative Analysis Of The Judgments Of The Constitutional Court Of Turkey And European Court Of Human Rights - 2024 #smrgKİTABEVİ
297.50
Legal systems, reflecting the dominant ideology present in societies, perpetuate patriarchal values and gendered power hierarchies. In this context, the judiciary and especially judges, are in a position to ameliorate this situation, both owing to their significant social role as State agents and subsequently their responsibilities with regards to the protection and effective realization of human rights. However, the conduct of judges may present barriers for access to justice on the basis of gender, especially through judicial stereotyping practices. This work will therefore suggest that a gender-conscious approach to judicial decision-making will improve the legal system and help it function free from bias. The proposed method for this is the incorporation of feminist legal methodologies, as will be showcased through a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the decisions of both the Constitutional Court of Turkey and European Court of Human Rights.
Legal systems, reflecting the dominant ideology present in societies, perpetuate patriarchal values and gendered power hierarchies. In this context, the judiciary and especially judges, are in a position to ameliorate this situation, both owing to their significant social role as State agents and subsequently their responsibilities with regards to the protection and effective realization of human rights. However, the conduct of judges may present barriers for access to justice on the basis of gender, especially through judicial stereotyping practices. This work will therefore suggest that a gender-conscious approach to judicial decision-making will improve the legal system and help it function free from bias. The proposed method for this is the incorporation of feminist legal methodologies, as will be showcased through a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the decisions of both the Constitutional Court of Turkey and European Court of Human Rights.
Yorum yaz
Bu kitabı henüz kimse eleştirmemiş.
Kapat